Skip to content

Service

Generative Engine Optimization

Get your brand quoted inside ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity answers, where a growing share of research now starts and ends.

Working on content structured so AI assistants can quote it correctly

What is generative engine optimization?

Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the work of getting your business mentioned, recommended and cited when people ask AI tools a question. The tools in question are ChatGPT, Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot and Claude. When someone asks one of them “which accounting software suits a small export business in India?”, GEO is about whether your name shows up in the answer and whether there’s a link to your site beside it.

With classic SEO the question is where your page sits in a list of ten links. GEO cares about something else: when a machine writes the answer itself, are you trusted enough to be used? Plenty overlaps. Still, once you watch how differently the two kinds of result behave, you start planning them separately.

The short answerGEO makes your brand and content easy for AI systems to find, understand, trust and quote. It rests on four things. First, AI crawlers must be able to read your pages. After that you need passages that each answer one question, facts worth quoting, and other websites confirming what you claim.

How an AI answer actually gets built

Left alone, a language model only knows what it read during training, and that reading stopped on a certain date. Ask about this year’s fees or a startup from last month and most AI search tools will search the web first, then write. The jargon for this is retrieval-augmented generation, RAG for short. Picture a student allowed to open five books before writing an exam answer, and you have the idea.

  1. Question“Best CA firm in Jaipur for startups?”.
  2. Rewrite. Split into several searches behind the scenes.
  3. Retrieve. Dozens of candidate pages pulled from an index.
  4. Select. A few passages chosen per sub-question.
  5. Write. Answer drafted from those passages.
  6. Cite. Some sources linked, others used silently.

Two parts of that flow matter most for GEO. The first is retrieval. If your page never makes it into the candidate pile, nothing else counts. That depends on ordinary search visibility, crawler access and whether your page matches the many sub-questions the system generates. Google calls this “query fan-out” in its AI Mode documentation, where one question becomes a dozen smaller searches behind the scenes.

The second is selection. Out of all the retrieved pages, the system lifts specific passages, not whole articles. A page that answers clearly, in a few self-contained sentences, gives the model something easy to use. A page that hides the answer in paragraph nine, after a long story about the company’s founding, gives it nothing.

Why the same question gets different answers

Ask ChatGPT the same question three times and you may get three different shortlists. Language models are probabilistic. They also personalise, use location, and may retrieve different pages each time. That’s normal, and it changes how you measure success. One screenshot proves very little. What matters is how often you appear across many runs of many relevant questions, a measure usually called prompt share or AI share of voice.

Mentions versus citations

Winning comes in two shapes. You might be mentioned, as in “Zoho Books and Tally are popular choices.” Or you might be cited, with your page shown as a source link. A brand can get the first without the second when the model already knows it from training or from review sites. The reverse happens too: your blog post supplies a number, gets the link, and your company name never appears in the sentence. We track both, because they need different fixes.

SEO and GEO side by side

People sometimes talk about GEO as if it replaces SEO. It doesn’t. Most AI search tools retrieve from search indexes, so pages that rank well are far more likely to be read in the first place. But what happens after retrieval follows different rules, and a site can rank on page one and still be ignored by the AI answer above it.

Traditional SEO.Generative engine optimization.
Goal.Rank a page high in a list of results.Be named, recommended or cited inside a written answer.
Unit that competes.The whole page.A passage, a fact, a brand name.
Typical query.Short: “crm software india”.Long and specific: “best CRM for a 10-person real estate team in Pune using WhatsApp”.
Main trust signals.Links, relevance, page experience.Consistent facts across sources, third-party mentions, clear evidence, entity clarity.
Success metric.Rankings, clicks, organic sessions.Prompt share, citations, brand mentions, AI referral traffic.
Result stability.Fairly stable day to day.Varies from one run to the next.

Our full comparison lives at GEO vs SEO, and there’s a shorter version in the answer what is the difference between SEO and GEO. You may also hear “AEO”, or answer engine optimisation. The terms overlap heavily; we use AEO for short, direct answers like featured snippets and voice results, and GEO for the broader job of being used by AI systems. Our answer engine optimisation page covers the first.

The numbers behind the shift

There’s a lot of hype in this space, so we stick to figures with a named source. Here are the ones we think matter most right now.

  • ~900Mweekly ChatGPT users, per OpenAI’s announcement in February 2026.
  • 58%lower click-through rate for the top organic result when an AI Overview appears (Ahrefs, Dec 2025 vs Dec 2023).
  • Up to 40%visibility gain from adding citations, quotes and statistics in the original GEO research paper.
  • 10,000queries in GEO-bench, the benchmark that paper used to test its methods.

Put those numbers side by side. Questions that used to go into Google now go to ChatGPT, roughly 900 million people a week of them. On Google itself, an AI summary at the top pulls clicks away from the links underneath; Ahrefs put the drop for the number-one result at about 58%, comparing December 2025 with December 2023 across 300,000 keywords. Being the page that summary quotes is now worth a lot.

What the research actually says

The term “generative engine optimization” comes from a 2023 research paper by Pranjal Aggarwal and colleagues, later presented at the KDD 2024 conference. The team built a benchmark of 10,000 queries and tested ways of rewriting web content to see what made AI engines use it more. Adding citations to credible sources, adding quotations and adding statistics gave the biggest lifts, improving visibility by up to 40% in their tests and up to 37% on Perplexity. Old-fashioned keyword stuffing did very little.

Keep two things in mind. “Up to” describes the best result in the study, not the typical one. And the AI products tested in 2023 have been rebuilt several times since. We see the same thing in client work. Pages with numbers, named sources and concrete detail get picked; pages full of padding get skipped.

A note on clicks: per question, AI answers send fewer visitors than ten blue links ever did. Someone arriving from a ChatGPT answer has typically read the gist already. Judge it by enquiries and orders from that traffic.

Eight levers that make you citable

Strip away the jargon and GEO comes down to a handful of things you can actually change. Some are technical, some are about writing, and a couple happen entirely off your website. Here they are in the order we usually tackle them.

1. Let the right crawlers in

AI companies run their own crawlers. OpenAI has GPTBot (training) and OAI-SearchBot (search features). Anthropic uses ClaudeBot. Perplexity runs PerplexityBot. Google uses its normal Googlebot for AI Overviews, plus a separate Google-Extended token that controls whether your content trains Gemini models. A surprising number of sites block some of these by accident, through a security plugin, a CDN bot setting or a copied robots.txt.

Keeping training crawlers out is a reasonable decision for some publishers. Keeping search crawlers out, on the other hand, usually means that tool simply can’t cite you. Decide bot by bot, write the decision down, and then look at your server logs a week later to see whether the bots are doing what you expected. We cover the trade-offs in should we block AI crawlers, and the AI crawler entry lists the user agents.

2. Make the page readable without JavaScript

Many AI crawlers fetch raw HTML and don’t run scripts. If your product details, prices or article text only appear after JavaScript runs, those crawlers see a near-empty page. Server-side rendering or static HTML fixes this. Our technical SEO page explains how to check in two minutes: view the page source and search for a sentence from your main content.

3. Answer first, then explain

Open every section with two or three sentences that fully answer its heading, and only then add the background, examples and exceptions. Reporters call it the inverted pyramid. An AI tool scanning your page finds a neat, quotable passage exactly where it looks first, and a busy reader gets the answer before deciding whether to read on.

Copy your customers’ wording in headings: “How much does GST registration cost for a freelancer?” Anyone skimming, human or bot, knows instantly what follows. People in the trade call this chunking.

4. Give facts worth quoting

The original GEO research found that statistics, quotations and citations to credible sources made content more likely to be used. That fits common sense. An AI tool answering “how long does a home loan approval take?” will prefer a page that says “most banks we’ve worked with approve in 7 to 15 working days once documents are complete” over one that says “approval times can vary.”

Specifics win: numbers, dates, prices, named methods, clear comparisons, short definitions. Original data is the strongest of all, because nobody else has it. A small survey of your own customers or an analysis of your own sales data can become the source everyone else, including AI tools, ends up citing.

Before and after

Vague: “Our solar panels offer excellent efficiency and great value for homeowners.”

Citable: “A 3 kW rooftop system in Rajasthan typically produces 12 to 15 units of electricity a day, depending on season and panel tilt. PM Surya Ghar subsidies can cut the price a lot; confirm today’s amount on the government portal first.”

An AI tool can repeat version two. A homeowner can act on it.

5. Be clear about who you are

AI systems organise the world as entities, meaning people, companies, products and places, plus the links between them. Spell your company name three different ways, let your founder’s LinkedIn bio contradict the About page, describe your services differently on every directory, and the model ends up with a blurry picture. Blurry brands rarely make the shortlist.

The fixes are unglamorous. One consistent name and description everywhere. Organisation schema with sameAs links to your real profiles. Proper author pages with real credentials. A clear About page that states what you do, where and since when. Our entity and semantic SEO service and the entity grounding sub-service go deep on this.

6. Get talked about elsewhere

AI tools seldom take a company’s word for itself when recommending brands. They lean on outside voices instead: review platforms, comparison articles, trade magazines, Reddit and Quora threads, YouTube reviews and news stories. Suppose three unrelated sources call you “the go-to option for small export businesses.” There is a decent chance that phrase turns up in an answer.

This is where GEO overlaps with PR. Appearing in a well-read “best tools for X” roundup, getting a quote in a trade publication or being discussed positively in a community thread can do more for AI visibility than another blog post on your own site. Our digital PR team and the citation building sub-service focus here. One warning: planting fake reviews or sockpuppet forum posts is both against platform rules and easy to spot. Earned mentions only.

7. Keep it fresh and dated

For prices, rules, software versions and statistics, AI search tools lean towards recent sources. “GST rates for 2024” loses to a page refreshed last month. Put a visible “last updated” date on such pages, change the content when the facts change, and redirect or retire the ones that can’t be saved. Our content decay entry shows how to spot pages going stale.

8. Make your facts agree everywhere

Say your website claims you were founded in 2015, Google shows 2016 and some directory says 2012. The model has to guess, and it may guess wrong. Old prices, previous addresses and retired product names cause the same confusion, and AI tools then repeat those errors to your customers. Ask a few AI tools to describe your company and you will often spot a mistake you can trace to one stale listing. Correct that listing and the answers tend to follow, given time.

This is also where AI “hallucinations” about brands often start. Models fill gaps. The fewer gaps and contradictions you leave, the less there is to fill with guesses.

How each AI platform differs

“AI search” isn’t one thing. Each product finds and shows sources in its own way, and those differences change what you should focus on. The table reflects how these tools generally work as of late 2026; all of them change often.

Platform.Where it gets sources.How sources appear.What helps most.
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode.Google’s own search index, plus Maps, Shopping and other Google data.Links beside or below the summary.Strong classic SEO, clear passages, structured data, Business Profile for local.
ChatGPT (with search).Its own crawler plus third-party search and data partners.Inline citations and a sources list.Crawlable pages, third-party mentions, clear facts, being findable in Bing-style indexes.
Perplexity.Its own index and live web search.Numbered citations on almost every answer.Fresh, specific, well-structured pages; it cites heavily.
Microsoft Copilot.Bing’s index.Linked citations.Bing Webmaster Tools, Bing indexing, IndexNow.
Gemini.Google Search and Google’s knowledge systems.Linked sources when it searches.Same foundations as Google SEO, strong entity signals.
Claude.Web search when enabled, plus training data.Citations when it searches the web.Clear, accurate, crawlable pages and a consistent reputation.

One practical point stands out. Bing matters again. Several AI products draw on Bing’s index in some form, so a site that’s well indexed in Bing (and set up in Bing Webmaster Tools) has more doors open. It takes an hour to set up and most businesses have never bothered.

What about llms.txt?

llms.txt is a proposed file that lists a site’s most useful pages in plain markdown for language models. It’s easy to add and does no harm. But no major AI search product has publicly confirmed using it to choose sources, so we treat it as a small extra, not a strategy. If you want it set up properly, our llms.txt implementation service does exactly that, without overselling it.

Measuring AI visibility honestly

Measurement is where GEO attracts the most snake oil. Some dashboards boil everything down to one “AI rank.” That number is fiction. Ask the same thing twice and the answer changes; change the city, the user or the model version and it changes again. The honest method is dull: lots of questions, lots of runs, and a trend line.

Build a prompt set

Start with 30 to 100 questions your real customers ask, in their words. Mix the types: “best X for Y”, comparisons (“X vs Y”), problem questions (“why does my…”), price questions and brand questions (“is [your company] good?”). Sales calls, support tickets and Search Console queries are gold mines for these.

Run them regularly across tools

Run the set across the AI tools your customers actually use, several times each, on a regular schedule. Record whether you’re mentioned, whether you’re cited, where in the answer you appear, which competitors appear and what’s said about you. Our prompt share tracking service automates this.

Prompt share

Out of all the runs, how often does your brand appear? Tracked over time and against competitors.

Citation share

How often is one of your pages linked as a source? And which pages earn those links?

Accuracy

When AI tools describe you, are the facts right? Wrong prices or services are urgent fixes.

AI referral traffic

Visits from chatgpt.com, perplexity.ai, gemini.google.com and others, tracked in analytics, with conversions.

Track AI referrals in analytics

Inside GA4, set up a custom channel group (or a quick exploration) that catches sessions referred by chatgpt.com, perplexity.ai, copilot.microsoft.com, gemini.google.com and the like. Some AI visits carry no referrer at all and land in “direct”, so read the figure as a floor. Google’s AI Overviews are trickier still, because their clicks blend into ordinary Google organic. Our analytics and measurement team can wire this up.

Be wary of: any vendor that guarantees a position in ChatGPT, any report built from a single test run, and dashboards that can’t show you the actual answers behind their scores. If you can’t see the evidence, you can’t trust the number.

Three worked examples

None of these is a real client. Each one is stitched together from situations that crop up again and again in GEO audits, with invented names and illustrative numbers.

Example 1: a B2B software company missing from “best tools” answers

The situation. An Indian invoicing software company ranks on page one of Google for several product terms. Yet when you ask ChatGPT or Perplexity “best invoicing software for small businesses in India”, it rarely appears. Three larger competitors show up almost every time.

What the audit finds. The company’s own site is fine. The gap is elsewhere. Its competitors appear in a dozen independent comparison articles, have hundreds of reviews on software review platforms and come up in Reddit threads. The company has 14 reviews on one platform and almost no third-party coverage. Its own comparison page exists but is gated behind a form, so crawlers can’t read it.

The fix. The comparison page is ungated and rewritten with honest, specific feature tables. A review drive targets existing happy customers on two major software review sites. The team pitches original data (a yearly analysis of late-payment patterns among small businesses, built from anonymised usage data) to trade publications and finance writers.

What changes. Over several months, the company starts appearing in a growing share of the tracked prompts, first on Perplexity (which cites fresh sources heavily), then more often in ChatGPT. The late-payments report becomes a cited source in its own right. See SEO for SaaS and technology for more on this sector.

Example 2: a hospital chain that AI tools describe wrongly

The situation. A multi-speciality hospital group finds that AI assistants list a department it closed two years ago and quote outdated consultation fees. Patients turn up asking for services that no longer exist.

What the audit finds. The old department page still lives on the website, unlinked but indexed. Two health directories carry the old fee list. The hospital’s Wikipedia-style profile on a medical directory hasn’t been edited since 2021.

The fix. The old page is redirected to the relevant current department with a clear note. Directory listings are corrected. Department pages get a visible “last reviewed” date and a named medical reviewer. Fees move into a single, current, crawlable page.

What changes. AI answers gradually catch up as sources are recrawled. Within a few months most tools describe the current departments correctly. The lesson is that AI errors usually have a source, and fixing the source is the cure. More on this sector at healthcare and clinics.

Example 3: an online store invisible to AI shopping questions

The situation. A direct-to-consumer brand selling handmade leather bags gets good Google traffic for product names but never appears when people ask AI tools for “durable leather laptop bag under ₹8,000” or “best gift bag for a new office joiner”.

What the audit finds. Product pages are built with a JavaScript framework, and the descriptions load after scripts run. The text that does exist is poetic but vague: “crafted with passion, made to last.” There’s no mention of leather type, weight, laptop size, warranty or care instructions. Product schema is missing prices and availability.

The fix. Product pages are server-rendered. Each description gains a short spec block (leather type, dimensions, fits laptops up to 15.6 inches, weight, warranty, country of manufacture) and an honest “who this is for” paragraph. Product schema is completed with price, availability and reviews. A buying guide answers the real questions customers ask in sales chats.

What changes. The pages start appearing as sources for specific shopping questions, and Google Shopping-style AI results begin to include the products. The brand also notices fewer pre-sale questions in chat, because the answers are now on the page. Read more on ecommerce SEO and agentic commerce.

How we run a GEO programme

A GEO programme starts with evidence: what AI tools say about you today, and why. Here’s how we work through it.

  1. Week 1

    Prompt set and baseline

    Sitting with your sales or support lead, we list the questions customers really ask. Then we run them through ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google and whatever else your buyers use, and show you every answer: where you appear, where a rival appears instead, and what gets said about you.

  2. Week 1 to 2

    Technical access check

    Next we open robots.txt, the CDN and firewall settings, and a slice of server logs, and we check how pages render without JavaScript. More than once a “mystery” turns out to be a Cloudflare toggle blocking every AI bot since 2023.

  3. Week 2 to 3

    Source analysis

    For every question we note which sites the tools cite. Pretty quickly you see the handful of publications, review platforms and forums that shape answers in your market, and the ones where you’re nowhere.

  4. Week 3 to 4

    Content and entity fixes

    Key pages get rebuilt to answer up front, with real numbers and evidence added. Mismatched company details get fixed and schema ties it together. Our answer-ready content sub-service handles this part.

  5. Month 2 onward

    Off-site authority

    Then the slow part. Reviews from real customers, a spot in the comparison articles that matter, quotes in trade press, useful replies in community threads, very often hung on a piece of original data only you have.

  6. Monthly

    Tracking and governance

    Prompt share, citations, accuracy and AI referral traffic are tracked monthly against the baseline. We also help set rules for how your team uses AI in content production, through our AI content governance work.

Want to start smaller? An AI visibility audit covers the first three steps and gives you a prioritised list to act on yourself.

What to do first

Do first: high impact, low effort. Unblock AI search crawlers you want. Fix wrong facts about your business. Ungate key comparison and pricing pages. Add answer-first openings to your top pages.
Plan next: high impact, high effort. Publish original data. Earn coverage in the sources AI tools cite. Move JavaScript-only pages to server rendering. Build a review programme.
Batch together: low impact, low effort. Add llms.txt. Set up Bing Webmaster Tools. Add “last updated” dates. Tidy author bios.
Usually skip: low impact, high effort. Rewriting your whole site “for AI”. Chasing a single tool’s daily answer. Buying placements in low-quality listicles.
← Lower effortHigher effort →

Start with access and accuracy. If AI crawlers can’t read your site, or the facts about you are wrong, nothing else will land properly. Then improve your most important pages. Off-site authority takes the longest, so start it early, but don’t expect it to replace the basics.

A free 35-point GEO checklist

Use this to check where you stand. Most points can be tested with a browser, your robots.txt file and a free AI tool account.

Access and rendering

  • robots.txt reflects a deliberate choice about each AI crawler.
  • CDN or firewall isn’t silently blocking AI bots.
  • Server logs show AI search crawlers visiting key pages.
  • Main content appears in the raw page source.
  • Key pages aren’t behind logins or forms.
  • Site is verified in Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools.
  • XML sitemap is current and submitted.

Content structure

  • Each important page opens with a direct answer.
  • Headings match the questions customers actually ask.
  • Each section makes sense read on its own.
  • Pages include specific numbers, prices, dates or ranges.
  • Claims link to credible sources where relevant.
  • Comparison and “vs” pages are honest and detailed.
  • Visible “last updated” dates on time-sensitive pages.
  • Out-of-date pages are updated, merged or redirected.
  • Tables and lists are real HTML, not images.

Entity and trust

  • One consistent company name and description everywhere.
  • Organisation schema with logo and sameAs links.
  • Clear About page: what you do, where, since when, who runs it.
  • Author pages with real names, roles and credentials.
  • Contact details easy to find.
  • Product or service schema with accurate details.
  • Facts match across your site, profiles and directories.

Off-site reputation

  • Reviews on the platforms your industry uses.
  • Mentions in independent comparison or “best of” articles.
  • Presence in relevant community discussions.
  • Coverage in trade or local media.
  • At least one piece of original data others can cite.

Measurement

  • A written prompt set of real customer questions.
  • Regular runs across the main AI tools.
  • Competitor appearances tracked alongside yours.
  • AI referral traffic segmented in analytics.
  • Conversions from AI referrals tracked.
  • A process to correct wrong facts when found.
  • Quarterly review of what’s changed.

Want a second opinion? Send us your site and three questions your customers ask. We’ll show you what the main AI tools say today.

GEO myths worth dropping

Myth. GEO replaces SEO.
Reality. Most AI search tools retrieve from search indexes. Strong SEO is the entry ticket; GEO builds on it.
Myth. There’s a secret prompt or file that makes ChatGPT recommend you.
Reality. No file or trick controls AI answers. llms.txt is optional and unconfirmed as a ranking input.
Myth. You can rank in ChatGPT like you rank in Google.
Reality. Answers vary from run to run. Measure how often you appear across many questions, not one position.
Myth. AI-written content is what AI tools want.
Reality. Generic AI text adds nothing new, so there’s no reason to cite it. Original facts and experience are what get used.
Myth. Blocking AI crawlers protects you with no downside.
Reality. Blocking search-style AI crawlers can remove you from those tools’ answers. Decide crawler by crawler.
Myth. Only big brands get mentioned.
Reality. For specific, niche or local questions, smaller businesses with clear, detailed pages are often the best source available.

What GEO costs and how long it takes

Three things set the price. How many topics and countries you want covered, how many existing pages need reworking, and how much happens off your site (review drives, PR pitches, a piece of original research). A one-off audit with a ranked action list has a fixed fee. Ongoing work is monthly, since the tracking and the outreach don’t really have an end date. You can see how we scope on our pricing page, and retainer vs project helps if you’re unsure which suits you.

Typical timelines

Baseline and audit2 to 4 weeks
Access fixes live1 to 4 weeks
Page rewrites picked up1 to 3 months
Off-site mentions build3 to 6 months
Steady prompt share gains4 to 9 months

Tools that search the live web, like Perplexity, can reflect page changes within days or weeks. Answers that lean on a model’s training data change more slowly, because they depend on when the model is next updated. Off-site reputation is slowest of all, and also the hardest for competitors to copy.

What a monthly GEO report should show you

Whoever runs your GEO, you should be able to check their homework every month. Ask for the list of questions used, which tools were tested and when, your prompt share and citation share next to named competitors, a few saved answers you can read yourself, any wrong facts found about your business and what was done, AI referral visits and enquiries from analytics, and a short note of what changed on and off your site. Shown a score with no answers behind it? Ask for the answers. A decent partner hands them over without fuss.

Who needs GEO most

Who benefits most? Businesses whose buyers do homework. A founder comparing payroll tools, a parent shortlisting coaching institutes in Kota, a family pricing a 1.5-tonne inverter AC on a Sunday afternoon. Those people type long questions into AI tools and actually read the answers. Software, lending, insurance, hospitals, education, B2B services and travel all follow this pattern. The chaat stall living on passing footfall gets far more from local SEO or ads.

GEO also works hand in hand with content and editorial, AI platform optimisation and technical SEO. On its own, it’s a thin layer. Combined with those, it’s a lasting advantage.

How to write a page AI tools want to quote

Let’s make this concrete. Imagine a chartered accountancy firm in Jaipur rewriting its “GST registration” page so AI tools start citing it. Here is how we’d rebuild that page, section by section.

  1. A one-paragraph answer

    The page opens by saying who must register (businesses crossing the turnover threshold, plus certain categories that must register regardless), roughly how long registration takes once documents are in order, and what the firm charges. Three sentences. If ChatGPT read nothing else, it would still get the basics right.

  2. Key facts in a small table

    Documents needed, government fee, the firm’s professional fee, typical turnaround, and which cities the firm handles. Price is very often the one fact people want, and the one thing firms leave off the page.

  3. How it works, step by step

    Application on the GST portal, OTP verification, document upload, officer review, certificate. Five numbered steps in plain Hindi-English terms clients already use. “How does GST registration work” is exactly the sort of thing people type into AI tools.

  4. When you don’t need us

    An honest note that a simple sole proprietor with all documents ready can file alone, and when professional help is worth paying for. Strangely, admitting this makes readers trust the page more, and it gives AI tools a balanced view to repeat.

  5. Evidence

    A short example of a client who registered a home bakery in under two weeks, the three mistakes the firm sees most often, and a link to the official GST portal for the current rules.

  6. Questions clients actually ask

    Pulled from the firm’s WhatsApp inbox: “Can I register with a rented flat address?”, “What if my PAN name doesn’t match my Aadhaar?” Each answered in two or three sentences.

  7. Who wrote it and when

    The name of the CA who wrote or checked it, their membership number shown on the About page, and a “last reviewed” date.

Nothing in that list is a trick. It’s just a page that respects the reader’s time, which is the slightly awkward truth about GEO: the pages AI systems like best are the pages people wanted all along. Google’s idea of E-E-A-T describes much the same qualities.

Run your own AI visibility check in 30 minutes

You don’t need special software to get a first read on where you stand. A notebook, a free account on two or three chatbots and half an hour will tell you a lot. Here’s the routine we’d suggest to any business owner.

  1. 5 minutes

    Write ten real questions

    Grab the last month of sales enquiries. Pick two “best X for Y” questions, two “X or Y?” comparisons, two about price, two describing a problem and two that mention your company by name. Keep the customer’s own clumsy wording; nobody types “comprehensive accounting solutions.”

  2. 15 minutes

    Ask three tools

    Open ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google in an incognito window, so last week’s searches don’t colour anything. Ask all ten in each. On Google, read the AI Overview or switch to AI Mode. Copy every reply into one Google Doc.

  3. 5 minutes

    Mark what you see

    Make four columns: mentioned, linked, which rivals showed up, anything wrong about you. Ticks and crosses are enough.

  4. 5 minutes

    Look at the sources

    Click the sources under each answer. You’ll see the same five or six websites again and again, maybe a review platform, a comparison blog, one busy forum. Those sites are steering the answers in your market, so that’s where your outside effort begins.

Repeat it next month, and again in three months. It’s rough, sure. Yet even a rough check shows which way things are moving, and the first run nearly always uncovers some wrong fact about the business that takes an afternoon to fix.

What people usually discoverThe same handful of surprises turn up on almost every first check. The AI lists a service the business dropped a year ago. One competitor features in every single answer, traced back to a single popular comparison article. The business gets named but placed in the wrong city. Or the business itself never appears, while a Justdial listing about it is cited instead. Each one tells you exactly what to fix next.

GEO by industry

The eight levers apply to everyone. What changes from one industry to the next is which outside sources the the assistants lean on. A software buyer’s answer is built from G2-style review sites and comparison blogs; a patient’s answer leans on hospital pages and medical directories. Aim at the wrong sources and you can spend six months getting nowhere.

Industry.Sources AI tools tend to lean on.Where to focus first.
SaaS and software.Software review platforms, comparison articles, developer forums, documentation.Reviews, honest comparison pages, crawlable docs and pricing.
Ecommerce.Product pages, merchant data, review content, buying guides, video reviews.Complete product specs, product schema, accurate prices and stock.
Healthcare.Hospital and clinic sites, medical directories, government health sources.Accurate department pages, named medical reviewers, consistent directory data.
Finance.Regulator sites, financial news, comparison sites, bank and lender pages.Clear, current rates and terms; compliance-checked explanations.
Education.Institution sites, ranking lists, student forums, course aggregators.Course pages with fees, duration, eligibility and outcomes.
Travel and hospitality.Review sites, booking platforms, travel blogs, maps data.Multi-platform reviews, accurate amenities, location details.
B2B services.Trade media, case studies, LinkedIn content, industry directories.Specific case examples, expert commentary, directory profiles.

Regulated industries need extra care. In healthcare and finance, an AI tool repeating an outdated claim about your product can create real problems for customers and for compliance. Accuracy checks belong at the top of the list there. You can see how we approach these sectors on finance and fintech and education and training.

Content formats ChatGPT and its rivals cite most

Spend a week reading the sources these assistants cite and a pattern jumps out. They love pages that hand over a short, correct answer with no fuss, because that is exactly what they need to build a reply and show a link. Six formats keep turning up.

Clear definitions

“What is X” pages that define a term in one or two sentences before expanding. Glossaries work well; see our own GEO glossary entry.

Comparisons

“X vs Y” pages with a table of real differences and a fair verdict on who each option suits.

How-to guides

Numbered steps, what you need before starting, and where people usually go wrong, like a recipe card.

Original data

Your own survey of 400 customers, with the method explained, can become the number every article and chatbot quotes for years.

Pricing and specs

Today’s prices, plan limits and spec sheets as normal text on the page, never trapped in a PDF or image.

Expert answers

Short, direct answers to specific questions, written or reviewed by someone with real experience.

What hardly ever turns up? The 5,000-word “ultimate guide” that repeats the first ten Google results, and the opinion piece with no facts in it. Fine for brand building, perhaps. Rarely cited.

Common mistakes we see on GEO projects

We keep running into the same four mistakes. Teams start writing for robots, so pages fill up with stiff question headings no human enjoys. Somebody checks one ChatGPT answer every morning and panics at normal day-to-day wobble. Off-site reputation gets ignored in the hope that on-page edits alone will win recommendations. And the worst one: pumping out hundreds of AI-written posts to be “found” more, when none of them says anything a tool would bother quoting.

All four have one cure. Build the most useful, accurate, specific page on each topic that matters to you, keep it readable for humans and machines, and earn honest mentions from other people. Our editorial policy sets out how we apply that to our own pages.

GEO in multilingual markets

A good share of questions never come in English at all. “Jaipur mein sabse accha physiotherapist kaun hai” works perfectly well in ChatGPT, and plenty of people speak to assistants in Tamil or Marathi. Behind the scenes the bot often reads English pages and replies in Hindi, which means your English page may be the real source of a Hindi answer.

Even so, a Hindi or Gujarati page has an edge when the question comes in that language, and you’ll face maybe a tenth of the competition you’d meet in English. Four or five well-written pages covering your commonest questions is usually plenty. Skip Google Translate copies; they garble exactly the words people search with.

Exporters hit a version of this too. Somebody in Dubai asks about your service in dirhams and UAE rules; somebody in Manchester asks in pounds with UK regulations in mind. Give each market its own properly written page, link them with hreflang, and the bots get the right local facts. The international SEO entry explains the setup, and our locations pages list where we work.

A word on ethics

GEO is young, so some of what’s sold under the label is plain manipulation: hidden text meant only for AI crawlers, fake reviews, paid listicle slots posing as independent picks, prompt-injection snippets buried in page code. Apart from being dishonest, these stop working fast, and they can get a site penalised or a brand embarrassed in public. We won’t touch them. The route that lasts is boring: be good at what you do, explain it clearly, and let other people vouch for you.

Common questions about generative engine optimization

What is generative engine optimization in simple words?

Picture a customer asking ChatGPT, “Which interior designer in Jaipur does small 2BHK flats on a tight budget?” GEO is the work that decides whether your studio’s name comes up in that reply, and whether your website is linked underneath it. Same idea for Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google’s AI Overviews.

Is GEO different from SEO?

Partly. SEO tries to get a page into the top ten links; GEO tries to get your business used inside the paragraph an AI writes. Since many the bots run a web search before answering, decent SEO usually comes first. On top of that GEO adds things SEO cares less about, like passages that stand alone, numbers worth quoting, one consistent company profile everywhere, and what other sites say about you.

How long does GEO take to show results?

Perplexity searches the live web, so a rewritten page can start appearing there within a few weeks. ChatGPT and Gemini answers shift more slowly. Across all the tools, expect three to nine months for a clear trend, mostly because press mentions, reviews and model updates arrive on their own schedule.

Can you guarantee my brand will appear in ChatGPT?

No. OpenAI decides what ChatGPT says, not any agency, and the same question can produce a different list tomorrow. Anyone promising a fixed spot is guessing or bluffing. We can promise a clear method, tracking you can check yourself, and an honest report of whether your share of answers is going up.

Does structured data help with AI search?

It helps machines read your details correctly: company name, address, prices, product specs, authors. That matters, because wrong facts get repeated. It won’t force a citation on its own, though. Treat schema as proofreading for robots.

Should we block AI crawlers to protect our content?

A news publisher whose articles are the product may reasonably block training bots. A dental clinic, a SaaS tool or a furniture store usually wants AI search bots in, since a citation can bring a customer. You don’t have to choose all or nothing; robots.txt lets you allow OAI-SearchBot, for example, while blocking GPTBot.

Do AI tools prefer long content?

Length alone does nothing. A long page does well only when it’s made of clear sections that each answer a real question, because then it matches more of the smaller searches an AI tool runs behind the scenes. Five hundred useful words beat three thousand padded ones.

How do I know if AI tools are sending me traffic?

In Google Analytics 4, look at referrals from chatgpt.com, perplexity.ai, copilot.microsoft.com and gemini.google.com. Treat that as the minimum, because some AI visits arrive with no referrer and sit under “direct”. Clicks from Google’s own AI Overviews are mixed into normal Google organic traffic, so you can’t separate those cleanly.

Will AI-generated content help my GEO?

Only if it says something new. If your article repeats what ten other sites already say, an AI tool has no reason to quote you over them. Drafting with AI help is fine. Mass-publishing generic AI articles tends to earn zero citations and can drag down how search engines rate the whole site.

What is prompt share?

Run, say, 50 customer questions through three AI tools, five times each. If your brand shows up in 150 of those 750 answers, your prompt share is 20%. It’s the nearest thing GEO has to a ranking, and it only means much when you compare it month to month and against named competitors.

Is GEO only for big brands?

Not at all. Ask a generic question like “best laptop” and big names win. Ask “best laptop repair shop in Mansarovar that fixes MacBook hinges” and the small shop with a detailed page has the advantage. Most real customer questions look like the second one.

Where should a small business start?

Spend half an hour asking ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google five questions your customers ask, and write down what each says about you and your rivals. Check your robots.txt isn’t blocking AI search bots. Fix any wrong facts you found. Then rewrite your three most important pages so each one opens with a plain answer. That alone covers a big share of the early gains.

Inside Generative Engine Optimization

The specific pieces of work this service is made of, each scoped separately.

AI visibility audit

Find out whether the assistants your buyers use will name you, and why they currently do not.

AI visibility audit

Answer-ready content structure

Restructure pages so a model can lift a correct, complete answer out of them without guessing.

Answer-ready content structure

llms.txt and AI crawler access

Make sure the systems that build AI answers can reach, read and correctly attribute your content.

llms.txt and AI crawler access

Brand entity grounding

Make your brand an unambiguous entity so models stop confusing you with a similarly named company.

Brand entity grounding

Citation source building

Earn mentions on the specific sources that assistants in your category actually quote.

Citation source building

Prompt share tracking

Measure your share of AI answers the way you would measure share of voice, repeatedly and comparably.

Prompt share tracking

AI content governance

Keep AI-assisted production from quietly degrading the content that earns your visibility.

AI content governance

Generative Engine Optimization by location

Local market notes for the places this comes up most.

Ask us to look at your Generative Engine Optimization setup

We look before the call, so the call is about findings rather than introductions.

Ask for a review of your site

We look at the site before the call, so the call is about findings rather than introductions.

What happens to what you send is set out in the privacy policy. We do not sell or share it.

Find out what is actually holding this back

Tell us what you sell and what is not working. We will come back with the two or three things we would look at before anything else.

CallWhatsAppGet a quote